Architecture and lighting should complement each other. Lighting is often a supporting role, and of course sometimes it will be the protagonist. But as a supporting role, it should be willing to be a supporting role and do it properly. Sometimes investing a lot of money and using a lot of high-tech to make the city lights very fancy and gorgeous, will make a city lose its original connotation and charm.
What should the night of a city look like? How does the
urban night scene reflect the national character and culture? Is it only lively with lanterns, gongs and drums? Can the
urban night scene in Beijing have ink and wash feelings, and can it be more elegant? How should the scale of "dynamic" and "quiet" of city lights be grasped?
The "movement" and "quiet" of the light should be appropriate. Dynamic things will make people excited. Some commercial buildings and public places that require constantly changing information are themselves places where people gather, a place where people can experience the city`s feasting and feasting. , but it will make people feel very excited, because this is what a metropolis should look like. On the other hand, if it is an ordinary
residential building, it would be terrible to design the lights to flash, or if it is a cultural building, it will only make people feel the lack of culture.
When dealing with city lights, you should be aware of: learn to be delicate and low-key, and the power of calm is often more lasting and sustainable. My ideal city lighting should be rational and restrained, with soft and warm lighting, appropriately refined and low-key.
